Corrigan v. Miller

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of judgment of no cause for action, dismissing their action for ejectment against defendants. The action involves a boundary dispute between the parties, who own adjoining parcels of land in Kent County, and was submitted to the trial court oh briefs, testimony contained in a deposition of plaintiff Carl Corrigan, a survey done by William F. DeYoung, and the trial court’s personal inspection of the premises.

In his deposition testimony, Carl Corrigan did not dispute that the survey line, approximately 22 feet west of the fence he had assumed was the boundary…