Hudson Motor Specialties Co. v. Apco Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The bill charges infringement of letters patent No. 1,263,879, to Anthony Gerosa, for “lug for power plant support for motor vehicles,” granted April 23, .1918, on application filed May 9, 1917. The bill also charges infringement of plaintiffs’ trade-mark “Crank Case Repair Arm,” and unfair competition in the copying of the special form in which plaintiff, Hudson Motor Specialties Company, had embodied the invention of the Gerosa patent.
The defendant has filed a so-called counterclaim, alleging inequitable conduct of the plaintiff Hudson Motor Specialties Company in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Grafton v. MeiklehamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Keystone Type Foundry v. Portland Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
- Eisenstadt Mfg. Co. v. J. M. Fisher Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Kauz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Winston & Newell Co. v. Piggly Wiggly Northwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Trico Products Corporation v. Ace Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1929
- United Kingdom Optical Co. v. American Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.