Legal Opinion

Winston & Newell Co. v. Piggly Wiggly Northwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1946No. 34,123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to enjoin defendant from using a coffee bag which it claims is a simulation of one long used by it. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a wholesale grocer and that it roasts and packs coffee known as “Red Rooster” brand, which has acquired an enormously valuable reputation and good will, and that “the purchasing public has associated the style, dress, wording and coloring of plaintiff’s coffee bags with plaintiff and as its product.” Plaintiff was granted certificates of trademark registration by the state of Minnesota registering the words “Red Rooster”…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Coats v. Merrick Thread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. United Healthcare Insurance Co. Aarp v. AdvancepcsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Miller v. MonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Venn v. GoedertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. B. B. Pen Co. v. Brown & BigelowDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API