Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McTaggart v. Middleton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1933No. 7,133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

— The application for an alternative writ of mandate is denied. The court is asked to look behind the enrolled bill which received the signature of the Speaker of the House, of the Lieutenant Governor as President of the Senate, and the approval of the Governor, in order to correct an error made during the progress of the bill before it came to the presiding officers of the respective Houses for signature. For us this subject is foreclosed; this court can look behind the enrolled bill for one purpose only, and that is to see whether the constitutional mandate requiring that on the final…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Martien v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Palatine Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Woodward v. MoultonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Gregg v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. O'Bannon v. GustafsonMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API