Legal Opinion

O'Bannon v. Gustafson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1956No. 9583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANDERSON:

This is an appeal from a judgment for the respondents entered by the district court of the fourth judicial district, Missoula County. The cause was heard by the Honorable C. E. Comer, district judge, on appeal from an order of the Industrial Accident Board of the State of Montana, wherein the board ruled that the respondents, Fred and Hazel O’Bannon, were dependents within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but were not entitled to compensation because the statute of limitations for the filing of a claim had run.

The respondents are the parents of John…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Andrews v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Johnson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Bray v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Neiberger v. McCulloughIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ricks v. Teslow ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. General Agriculture Corporation v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ricks v. Teslow ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API