Commonwealth v. Jones
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This appeal by the Commonwealth arises from the lower court’s granting of the appellees’ motion to suppress evidence discovered after an allegedly illegal search and seizure. The lower court cited the following comprehensive reasons for granting the motion to suppress: “(1) The warrant did not contain information upon which the magistrate could independently conclude there was probable cause for the search. In fact, no probable cause existed at the time the warrant was issued because of a lapse of at least twenty-one days between the time the alleged contraband was seen…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. NovakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. KaschikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TuckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.