Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Novak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence arising from appellant’s conviction of receiving stolen goods and violation of the Dangerous Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. Appellant’s sole contention is that certain evidence should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant failed to establish probable cause.

The relevant portion of the affidavit is as follows: “Said John Patterson [the informant] stated that he had bought these drugs from Broady [Novak] more than one dozen times within the last two months.” The affidavit sets forth no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Coinmonwealth v. EazerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. HoppertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. United States v. Bruce L. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Crider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API