In re Philbrook
California Supreme Court
Motion.for a new trial of a proceeding for disbarment of Horace W. Philbrook as an attorney at law. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
After the decision made in this case on the 5th of January, 1895 (105 Cal. 471), the respondent filed a petition to vacate the decision and judgment and for a rehearing. Upon this an elaborate argument was made, and the petition was denied. It is insisted that respondent has still pending and undisposed of a- motion for a new trial.
Ho notice of a motion for a new trial was given, other than in the petition referred to, in which it is said: “ So far. as this is a motion for a new trial it is submitted upon the minutes of the court.”
Respondent cites two cases, decided under the former…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Disbarment of PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. CoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Nevada Bank v. SteinmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. BataniMontana Supreme Court · 1936