Granger's Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Motion to set aside an order granting a rehearing. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, J.—
This proceeding is an original petition in this court for a writ of prohibition. There was a decision here in favor of petitioner August 19, 1893; but within thirty days thereafter an order of this court was made granting a rehearing. Petitioner now moves to set aside said order granting said rehearing upon the ground that the court had no power to make it—contending that a motion for a new trial was the proper remedy.
The point was substantially determined against petitioner’s contention in In re Tyler, 71 Cal. 374. It may be further said that the present constitution provides…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Noel v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. BataniMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Bellows v. Aliquot Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- In re PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895