Nevada Bank v. Steinmitz
California Supreme Court
Application for the issuance of a writ of mandate according to the previous judgment of the court, notwithstanding the filing of a writ of error and bond. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff that a writ of mandate issue according to the judgment of this court.
On the 17th of November, 1882, this court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff that it was entitled to a writ of mandate as prayed for. A petition for' rehearing was denied December 16, 1882. The defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied November 27, 1883. A writ of error for the removal of the cause to the Supreme Court of the United States was allowed and filed January 23, 1884, and on the same day a bond approved by the chief justice of this court was filed;
It thus appears that…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- Woods v. LindvallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1891
- In re PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Carracciolo v. Corte de Distrito de GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- Carracciolo v. District Court of GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924