Legal Opinion

Kies v. Wilkinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1921No. 16090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Hewen, J., entered May 28, 1920, upon findings in favor of plaintiffs, in an action in tort, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— This case was before the court on a prior appeal, and is reported in 101 Wash. 340, 172' Pac. 351, to which reference is made for a statement of the facts and issues.

The judgment of the trial court, then in favor of the defendant Wilkinson, was reversed, with directions to permit the amendment of the complaint so as to allege the amount of the assets of the defunct bank and the amount of the claims proved and provable against it, so that it might appear that the creditors of the bank had been damaged by what was held to be the wrongful withdrawal of funds from the bank by *90Wilkinson, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kies v. WilkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kilcup v. McManusWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Shaw v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Beakley v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Dephillips v. NeslinWashington Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API