Dephillips v. Neslin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPabkeb, J.
The plaintiff, DePhillips, commenced this action in the superior court for Walla Walla county, seeking recovery of damages from the defendant, H. L. Neslin, and from the defendant community consisting of H. L. and Vera Neslin, upon three causes of action; the first for slander, the second for assault, and the third for malicious prosecution; all, it is claimed, growing out of one transaction and perpetrated by the defendant Neslin, while acting for himself and the community. Each of the three causes of action, as pleaded in the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, was demurred to in behalf…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Milne v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- McGregor v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Kangley v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Catlin v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Newbury v. RemingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Werker v. KnoxWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Benson v. BushCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.