Legal Opinion
Simmons v. Hansen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1941No. 11756PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This was a patent suit brought by ap-pellee as plaintiff, charging the appellant with infringement of two patents, one a method patent for grinding bread-slicing machine blades, No. 2,002,812, and the other a machine patent for practicing the method patent, No. 2,082,832. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared below.
Defendant answered, denying invention in either of the patents and pleading that they had been anticipated by the prior art. The court found the method patent lacking in novelty or invention but sustained certain • claims of the machine patent. No…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brush v. ConditSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Pfizer Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Margaret Uprichard, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Emil Schlittler and Andreia UfferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.