Brush v. Condit
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. In equity for the infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill,, from which the plaintiffs appealed.' The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Charles F. Brush and The Brush Electric Company, in a suit in equity brought by them in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, against C. Harrison Condit, Joseph Hanson and Abraham Tan "Winkle, from a decree dismissing with costs their bill of complaint, so far as it relates to reissued letters patent No. 8718, granted May 20, 1879, to Charles F. Brush, one of the plaintiffs, for “improvements in electric lamps,” on an. application for a reissue filed April 14, 1879, the original letters patent, No. 203,411, having…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hall v. MacNealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by53 opinions
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- A. Schrader's Sons v. Wein Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.