Legal Opinion
Application of Emil Schlittler and Andreia Uffer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 21, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 11 to 15, inclusive, of appellants’ application for a patent on “Amines and Process for the Preparation of Amines.” Claims 11 and 13 are the only appealed claims which have been considered on their merits. Claims 12,14, and 15 stand rejected as not readable on the elected species, no generic claim having been allowed. Under such circumstances, those claims are not before us for consideration on their merits. In re Stoll, 161…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Carboline Company v. Mobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Deering, Milliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Superior Electric Company v. GENERAL RADIO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
- Rolls-Royce Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.