Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the allegedly negligent movement of a train owned by the defendant and operated by it on a side track in Winchester belonging to the plaintiff’s employer. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s exceptions relate to the admission of evidence, to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict, and to the charge.

The jury could have found the following facts: ' On May 24, 1943, the plaintiff was employed by the General Crushed Stone Company, for which he had worked six or seven years. His…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Bachant v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Hines v. Stanley G. I. Electric Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Mielke v. DobrydnioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Hyslop v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Vieira v. East Taunton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Schulz v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Bacon v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Bacon v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API