Mielke v. Dobrydnio
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Two actions of tort, the first action being for personal injuries, sustained in a collision on Holyoke Street in Easthampton on November 24, 1920, between a horse and wagon which were owned by the plaintiff’s husband, the plaintiff in the second, action, and which she was driving, and an automobile owned and operated by the defendant; and the second action being by the husband for damage to the horse and wagon and consequential damages due to the injury to his wife.
Read the full summary
Two actions of tort, the first action being for personal injuries, sustained in a collision on Holyoke Street in Easthampton on November 24, 1920, between a horse and wagon which were owned by the plaintiff’s husband, the plaintiff in the second, action, and which she was driving, and an automobile owned and operated by the defendant; and the second action being by the husband for damage to the horse and wagon and consequential damages due to the injury to his wife. Writs dated November 27, 1920. In the Superior Court, the action was tried before Aiken, C. J. One Clarence I. Sparks, a…
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These are two actions of tort: the first, to recover for personal injuries; the second for injuries to the plaintiff’s horse and damage to his wagon, and for consequential damages arising from injuries to his wife (the plaintiff in the first action), who will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff.
The actions grew out of a collision between a horse and wagon driven by the plaintiff and an automobile operated by the defendant. The accident occurred on the evening of November 24, 1920, at a time when it was dark and was snowing. There was •evidence that the plaintiff was driving along the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Gagnon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Eldridge v. BartonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Parker v. Boston & Hingham Steamboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Luz v. Stop & Shop, Inc. of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Bernasconi v. BassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. MezzanottiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Clark-Rice Corp. v. Waltham Bleachery & Dye WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.