Legal Opinion

Painter v. Potlatch Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2003No. 27390PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

David I. Painter (Painter) appeals from the decision of the Idaho Industrial Commission (the Commission) finding that Painter failed to prove that he was injured as a result of workplace accidents on September 15 and 16, 1997. This Court affirms the Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Painter alleged that he suffered injuries resulting from work-related accidents on September 15 and 16, 1997, while employed by Potlatch Corporation (Potlatch) as a journeyman machinist and “lead man” who supervised apprentice machinists. Painter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rodriguez v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Zapata v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bates v. SeldinIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API