Legal Opinion
Temple v. Horrall
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1949No. Civ. 16887PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants predicated upon the sustaining of their demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff’s second amended complaint, seeking to have his resignation from the Police Department of the city of Los Angeles cancelled on the ground of fraud and duress. There is also a purported appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer.
Facts
It was alleged in the complaint as amended that plaintiff had been a Los Angeles police officer for 17 years prior to October 18, 1947; that on such date he had resigned from the department under the coercion of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Moreno v. CairnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Steiner v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Snyder v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by14 opinions
- Keithley v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Blomquist v. ClagueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Hicks v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.