Legal Opinion
Hicks v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1955No. Civ. 20898PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal after defendants’ demurrer to his third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend in a proceeding entitled “Action in Equity, to Vacate, Annul and Set Aside Final Order of Civil Service Commission of the City of Los Angeles Sustaining Charges against Plaintiff and Removing Him from his Position, on the Ground that said Order was Obtained by Extrinsic Fraud.”
Briefly stated, the alleged facts are that defendant board of public works, on November 30, 1951, discharged plaintiff from the position of building operating engineer in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Newman v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Corcoran v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wolstenholme v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.