Legal Opinion

Keystone Cab Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2017No. 232 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE COVEY

Keystone Cab Service, Inc., EZ Taxi, LLC, United Cab, LLC and Good Cab, LLC (collectively, Protestants) appeal from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s (PUC) February 9, 2017 order adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) initial decision (Decision) granting Go Green Taxi, LLC’s (Go Green) application for approval to purchase the operating rights of AAA Alpine Taxicab Company, LLC (AAA Alpine) to transport persons in call or demand service in the City of Harrisburg (Harrisburg), Dauphin County and within ten miles of the Harrisburg limits (Application). The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D'ALESSANDRO v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. R.J.W. v. Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bountiful Capital, LLC v. Karen KaminskiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API