Legal Opinion

Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.1

Rosemont Taxicab Co., Inc. (Rosemont) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Philadelphia Parking Authority, Taxicab and Limousine Division (Parking Authority) denying its request to acquire the license of Concord Coach USA t/a Bennett Taxicab (Bennett Taxicab) to provide taxicab service in a part of Philadelphia. The Parking Authority denied Rosemont’s application for the stated reason that it lacked (1) sufficient technical expertise and (2) a commitment to provide safe and lawful taxicab service. The Public Utility Commission reached the opposite…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mrs. Smith's Frozen Foods Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Germantown Cab Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Keystone Cab Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API