Legal Opinion

Russell v. Parlee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The plaintiff received personal injuries while riding in an automobile operated by the defendant. The complaint set up two causes of action, one based on negligence, and one based on heedless and reckless disregard of the rights of others under our so-called guest statute (General Statutes, § 1628). In answer to written interrogatories the jury found that the plaintiff was entitled to recover upon the ground of the defendant’s negligence, but not upon the ground of her heedless and reckless disregard of the rights of others. The defendant appealed, assigning-error in the denial of its motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Perozzi v. GaniereOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API