Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption of G.R.L.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2011No. 509 EDA 2011, 510 EDA 2011, 511 EDA 2011, 512 EDA 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

Appellants, P.L. (“Father”) and T.K. (“Mother”) (collectively “Parents”), appeal from the orders entered in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Orphans’ Court, terminating their parental rights to G.R.L. and A.J.L. (“Children”). We hold the record belies Parents’ claim that OCY failed to meet the requirements of the Kinship Care Program at 62 P.S. § 1303. Moreover, the termination hearing was not the proper stage to inquire into the best adoptive alternative for Children, and it would be premature to resolve at the termination hearing Grandfather’s expressed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In Re Adoption of HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. In Re Adoption of J.E.F.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In the Interest of R.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In the Interest of C.J.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. P. and M.L. v. S.K. and R.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API