New York Life Insurance v. Slentz
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, C. J.:
In a motion for a rehearing and a brief in support thereof counsel for appellant urge the .court to reconsider the questions which we held to be controlling in our first opinion. This we have done, but we adhere to our judgment already rendered, and hold that a rehearing would serve no purpose.
However, our opinion does contain an inaccurate statement of fact at pages 852, 853 (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Slentz, 145 Kan. 849, 67 P. 2d 522), where we said that plaintiff’s motion for a sheriff’s deed filed on December 21, 1935, “was allowed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- New York Life Insurance v. SlentzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937