Legal Opinion

Pullen v. Warrick

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1985No. Docket 77522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On July 28, 1980, plaintiff was injured in a car accident. On April 27, 1982, she commenced an action against defendant, the driver of the car in which she was a passenger, for "injuries to her head, back, neck, arms, legs, a serious impairment of body function and permanent disfigurement, including, but not limited to, marked psychogenic residuals of the anxiety neurosis and concern with internal bleeding”. On November 8, 1983, defendant brought a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), on the ground that the "injuries and damages as alleged by plaintiff do not, as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brooks v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Nabkey v. Kent Community Action Program, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Jakubiec v. KumbierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. North River Insurance v. EndicottMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Earl v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Pullen v. WarrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API