Emery L. Negonsott v. Harold Samuels and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
This habeas case requires us to determine the scope of criminal jurisdiction granted by 18 U.S.C. § 3243 (1988) to the State of Kansas over state-law offenses committed by Indians on Indian lands. Petitioner Emery L. Negonsott claims that Kansas lacked subject matter jurisdiction to prosecute him for aggravated battery because that offense is within exclusive federal jurisdiction under the Federal Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153 (1988). The district court held that the State had jurisdiction. We agree and conclude that the federal grant of criminal jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jimmie D. Oyler v. Fred Allenbrand and the Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- True Oil Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. State Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.