Legal Opinion
Jimmie D. Oyler v. Fred Allenbrand and the Attorney General of Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1994No. 93-3192PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered ' submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Jimmie D. Oyler, a Native American, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging error in that court’s conclusion that Kansas has criminal jurisdiction over him. He further contends that the cigarette tax laws of Kansas are regulatory and thus…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Prost v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Gerald Marx v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Riley v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.