Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1897No. S. F. No. 427PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Fairbanks and the National Fire Insurance Company joined in this action to recover damages for the destruction of a certain building by fire, resulting from defendant’s negligence. It was alleged in the complaint that the building was the property of Fairbanks, of the value of eighteen hundred and thirty-five dollars, and insured by the insurance company for nine hundred dollars, which latter sum said company paid to Fairbanks before the commencement of the action; also, that Fairbanks’ business carried on in the building was interrupted by its destruction, to his loss of profit,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pierce v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Swarthout v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Home Mutual Insurance v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Morris v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gaugler v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1912
  5. Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API