Bolland v. O'Neal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Mille Lacs county to recover $9,422.13 damages for cutting and carrying away timber from plaintiff’s land. The case was tried before Searle, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This action was brought to recover damages from defendants for the cutting and carrying away of pine timber from land claimed to be owned by plaintiff. In 1894 the then owner of the land, Wray, executed in the usual form, under seal, a certain instrument by which he sold the standing pine on the land to defendants Mulvey & Carmichael. The consideration expressed was $1,200, and the granting clause was as follows:
*16“* * * do by these presents grant, bargain, and sell unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, the right, privilege, and permission to enter upon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pine County v. TozerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Christopher v. Curtis-Attalla Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Irwin v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Parno v. Iowa Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Pake v. Lindsey Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.