Ackley v. Prime
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to recover upon three assigned claims for money had and received, each claim being made the subject of a separate count in the complaint, the first of which was dismissed. The second and third counts are based upon allegations to the effect that defendant received from Samuel R. Allan and Charles Hammer, respectively, the sums of $365.55 and $477.55 to and for. the use of the Morton Hospital, a corporation, but refused to pay any part thereof to said corporation or to plaintiff. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff and the defendant appeals, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Razzo v. VarniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Harris v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Fox v. MonahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Meyer v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Clay v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Rains v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Roberts v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rubin v. TobermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.