Flynn v. Seale
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment by the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. A L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
The plaintiff and Henry W. Seale were for many years tenants in common of a tract of land in the county of Santa Clara, each owning an undivided half thereof, upon which there was a valuable quarry of building stone, and on September 6, 1888, said Henry W. Seale died, leaving a last will and testament, by which he devised the said land to the defendant herein, and since said date the plaintiff and the defendant have been cotenants thereof. The interest of said Henry W. Seale in said land was distributed to the defendant by an order of the superior court May 23, 1890, and on March 25, 1892, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.