Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 4, 2009No. Civil Action 07-797 (RWR)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Karen Kimmel brings this action against Gallaudet University alleging retaliation in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., retaliation, disability discrimination, and hostile work environment in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), § 2-1401.01 et seq., and tortious interference with prospective business relations. Gallaudet has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. With reasonable inferences…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jankovic v. International Crisis GroupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API