Legal Opinion
Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0030PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Todd W. Smith formerly worked as a lobbyist for Defendant Rubi con Advisors, LLC. Mr. Smith seeks damages from Rubicon on a variety of theories. Rubicon’s partial motion to dismiss challenges Mr. Smith’s claims for unjust enrichment and interference with prospective business opportunities. 1 Because Mr. Smith has stated a claim on both theories, the Court denies the motion.
II. BACKGROUND 2
Mr. Smith worked as a lobbyist for Rubicon from 2011 until he was fired…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Molock v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Africare, Inc. v. Xerox Complete Document Solutions Maryland, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- McFadden v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Molock v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Ronaldson v. National Association of Home BuildersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.