Legal Opinion

In re D.M.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2009No. 5-09-12, 5-09-13, 5-09-14PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re D.M.,

2009-Ohio-4112.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: D.M., CASE NO. 5-09-12 ALLEGED NEGLECTED AND DEPENDENT CHILD, OPINION [JULIE HENRY-WALLACE, MOTHER-APPELLANT]. IN THE MATTER OF: O.M., CASE NO. 5-09-13 ALLEGED NEGLECTED AND DEPENDENT CHILD, OPINION [JULIE HENRY-WALLACE, MOTHER-APPELLANT]. IN THE MATTER OF: B.M., CASE NO. 5-09-14 ALLEGED NEGLECTED AND DEPENDENT CHILD, OPINION [JULIE HENRY-WALLACE, MOTHER-APPELLANT]. Case No. 5-09-12 Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division Trial Court Nos.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In re HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re A.F.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In re M.F.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. In re J.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In re Jo.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API