Legal Opinion

In re Hayes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997No. 96-526PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This case concerns the interpretation of the six-month waiting period imposed by former R.C. 2151.413(A) on a children services agency seeking permanent custody of a child. Based on the intent of the legislation, we hold that former R.C. 2151.413(A) required that a children services agency seeking permanent custody of a child must have had temporary custody of the child for at least six months immediately preceding the filing of the motion for permanent custody. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*48Former R.C. 2151.413(A) stated that a children…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re H.F.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re D.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re C.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API