Legal Opinion

Hill v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 2006No. 06-83PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Gunter, Justice.

This appeal arises from an order of the Sebastian County Circuit Court finding a material change in circumstances to justify a modification of child support owed by appellee, James Edward Kelly, III, to appellant, Michele Kelly Hill, for their three children. On appeal, Hill raises three allegations of error, and Kelly brings a cross-appeal. We affirm the circuit court’s order as modified.

A recitation of the facts are contained in the first appeal, Kelly v. Kelly, 341 Ark. 596, 19 S.W.3d 1 (2000). The Kellys have three children. After the birth of their third child, Hill…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Niederkorn v. NiederkornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Ward v. DossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Grable v. GrableSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Paulino v. QHG of Springdale, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Nisha, LLC v. Tribuilt Construction Group, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Tucker v. Arkansas Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Valentine v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API