Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Kelly
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 8, 2000No. 99-1359PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENSKI R. Smith, Justice.
James E. Kelly, III, M.D., appeals . child-support order of the Sebastian County Chancery Court requiring that he pay twenty-five percent of any conditional bonus he receives, in addition to his monthly base-support obligation. Kelly argues that the court’s order is contrary to the provisions of Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order 10, because it does not set and establish a sum certain dollar amount. We agree and reverse.
Facts
James Edward Kelly, III, and Michele Newhause Kelly were married on August 8, 1983, in Ontario, Canada. The Kellys lived in Canada for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- McKay v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Scroggins v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Stewart v. WinfreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Valley v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- McWhorter v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Murphy v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.