Legal Opinion

Seaton v. Spence

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1963No. Civ. 10537PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against defendant to recover damages for injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Defendant in his answer pleaded contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.

Appellant’s main contentions involve the sufficiency of the evidence and asserted errors in instructions given and instructions refused. Before discussing these contentions we shall summarize the evidence as shown by the record, bearing in mind the familiar rule that the evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Ritchey v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Monastero v. Los Angeles Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Jordan v. Great Western MotorwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Quint v. PorietisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Hageman v. TownsendMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Vollaro v. LispiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Leo v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API