Legal Opinion
Connecticut Commercial Lenders, LLC v. Teague
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2008No. AC 28311PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
This foreclosure action involves a blanket mortgage secured by two parcels. After obtaining a partial judgment of strict foreclosure as to one parcel, the plaintiff, Connecticut Commercial Lenders, LLC, moved for a judgment of strict foreclosure on the other parcel. Relying on General Statutes § 49-15 as interpreted by of our Supreme Court in New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer, 244 Conn. 251, 708 A.2d 1378 (1998), the trial court concluded that, absent a motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure, the plaintiff could not obtain the relief requested. On appeal, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dupuy v. Western State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Town of Stratford v. LeblancConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Wells Fargo Bank v. SPRING TIME NO. 1, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2008