Legal Opinion

Fountain v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 16, 2016No. 315, 2015PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This appeal involves the interpretation and application of Delaware’s Amended Sentencing Act, .codified at 11 Del. C. § 3901(d), to determine if the Amended Sentencing Act is retroactive. The defendant-appellant, Martin E. Fountain (“Fountain”), appeals from the Superior Court’s judgment denying his motion for resentencing on grounds that the Amended Sentencing Act does not apply retroactively.

On appeal, Fountain — with the assistance of amicus curiae — argues that the Amended Sentencing Act vests a judge with the discretion to modify a consecutive sentence entered before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  3. Hubbard v. Hibbard Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  4. Bodnari v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Municipal Pension Trust Fund v. William E. Conway, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API