Fountain v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This appeal involves the interpretation and application of Delaware’s Amended Sentencing Act, .codified at 11 Del. C. § 3901(d), to determine if the Amended Sentencing Act is retroactive. The defendant-appellant, Martin E. Fountain (“Fountain”), appeals from the Superior Court’s judgment denying his motion for resentencing on grounds that the Amended Sentencing Act does not apply retroactively.
On appeal, Fountain — with the assistance of amicus curiae — argues that the Amended Sentencing Act vests a judge with the discretion to modify a consecutive sentence entered before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Hubbard v. Hibbard Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
3Cited by56 opinions
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- Bodnari v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Municipal Pension Trust Fund v. William E. Conway, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.