Morrissette v. DeZonia
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The preliminary issue here is whether mandamus is a proper remedy in this case.
A writ of mandamus lies to compel public officers to perform their prescribed statutory duties.
“. . . Mandamus, however, is an extraordinary remedy and will not lie if there is another adequate and specific remedy at law (Underwood v. Karns (1963), 21 Wis. 2d 175, 124 N. W. 2d 116), or if the act lies entirely within the discretion of the officer.”
And it has been held to be an abuse of discretion for a court to compel action through mandamus when the duty is not clear and unequivocal and requires the exercise of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Newspapers Inc. v. ShowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- St. John Vianney School v. Board of Education of School District of JanesvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- In Matter of Estate of WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.