Legal Opinion

Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 3, 1958PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The gravamen of these actions in tort for negligence is the wrongful exposure of plaintiff’s decedent, Ethel Biglioli, in the course of her employment with the defendant corporation, to '‘beryllium and its various compounds and combinations” used in the manufacture of fluorescent and incandescent electric light bulbs.

The first action was brought February 26, 1952 by Ethel Biglioli herself. The complaint alleged total permanent disability from the inhalation of toxic beryllium dust and fumes while in the pursuit of her work. Her death, August…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Emerson v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Alfone v. SarnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass FoundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API