Legal Opinion

People v. Brewster

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1984PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

An indictment obtained on the complaining witness’s testimony before the Grand Jury that she identified defendant, without informing that body that her identification had been made from photographs, is not dismissable under CPL 210.35 (subd 5). The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be affirmed.

Defendants Brewster and Alfonso were indicted with two others for first and second degree robbery, first degree burglary and criminal use of a firearm in the first and second degrees. Before the Grand Jury one of the complaining witnesses testified that she had made…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People v. ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. OakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. SpinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Molea v. MarascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. MikuszewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API