People v. Swamp
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
Where the Grand Jury heard only the results of a preliminary field test indicating the presence of cocaine, was an indictment charging possession of cocaine supported by legally sufficient evidence, or were the People required to submit the results of a formal laboratory analysis? Because the evidence before the Grand Jury, if uncontradicted, established that defendant possessed cocaine, we affirm the determination of the Appellate Division that the People presented a prima facie case sufficient for indictment.
When defendant crossed the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- People v. BelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. MaldonadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.