Legal Opinion

People v. Mikuszewski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1989PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

The criminal charges in this case stem from allegedly fraudulent efforts to feign compliance with minority business participation requirements in two public works contracts. The People through the State Attorney-General charge defendant Naneo Contracting Corp., acting through its vice-president and codefendant Mikuszewski, with making false representations, in required documents relating to the public works contracts, regarding G.R. Trucking, a supposedly State-approved independent minority-owned subcontractor. It was actually owned by codefendant Gustave…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. Warner-Lambert Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LipskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. BoodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. GalatroNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
  4. People v. ReyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. Mateo, New York County Courts1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API