Legal Opinion

Ries v. Barth Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 1905No. 1,051PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Appellants’ bill for infringement of letters patent No. 356,963, February 1, 1887, to Ries, was dismissed for want of equity.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Appellants’ bill for infringement of letters patent No. 356,963, February 1, 1887, to Ries, was dismissed for want of equity. The claims relied on are these: “(4) An electric-current transmitting or circuit closing apparatus provided with a primary lever for closing an electric circuit, a secondary lever arranged to be operated to gradually increase the flow of current through the said circuit, and actuating mechanism designed to automatically operate the secondary lever to increase the current strength…

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts). The general nature and the object of Ries’s invention are thus stated in the specification:

“This invention relates to certain improvements in circuit-closing apparatus, whereby the actuating-eurrent to the brake or other devices is applied gradually and with continuously increasing strength, so as not to subject said devices to the rapid wear and tear due to the sudden strain upon them when, as has heretofore been customary in operating such apparatus, the entire strength of the current is applied at once.
“It further relates to certain improvements whereby the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Aluminum Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  5. Lamson Consol. Stoke Service Co. v. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Century Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  5. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co. v. Union Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API