Moffatt Enterprises, Inc. v. Borden Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
The Moffatt brothers — Eugene, Raymond, Robert, and Sidney — and their corporation, Moffatt Enterprises, Inc., appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Borden, Inc. (“Borden”).
The plaintiffs marketed a urea-formaldehyde foam insulation called Insulspray through a series of yearly distributor agreements with Borden. These agreements contained a release of claims and permitted the parties to terminate their venture upon six months’ notice, or not to renew the distributorship at the end of the one-year terms. In their…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- CPS MedManagement LLC v. Bergen Regional Medical Center, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- C. David Beidleman v. The Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.