Legal Opinion

United States v. Stirn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1912No. 612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7175 (T. D. 31332).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This appeal involves the dutiability of wooden beams imported into the country wound with spun silk. The collector of customs at the *63port of New York classified tbe beams as manufactures of wood and assessed them for duty at 36 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 215 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph reads as follows:

215. House or cabinet furniture wholly or in chief value of wood, wholly or partly finished, and manufactures of wood or bark, or of which wood or bark is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for in this section, thirty-five per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HohnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. RingkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Stirn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Shalom Baby-Wear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API