United States v. Ringk
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29613 (T. D. 32780).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
These importations consist of wooden spools about 3 inches in length, upon which as imported was wound artificial or imitation silk yarn and artificial or imitation horsehair.
*350The merchandise was rated for duty by the collector at the port of New York under paragraphs 405 and 215 of the tariff act of 1909. The former paragraph in the part here applicable provides specific rates of duty for artificial or imitation silk and artificial or imitation horsehair yarns, threads, and filaments. There is nothing in paragraph 405, directly or indirectly, which may be construed as applicable to or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. MatagrinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scaramelli & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Stirn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. VandegriftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913